Model selection and benchmarking
Evidence-based selection across frontier and open-source models, benchmarked on your tasks and your data.
AI Engineering
Model-agnostic integration with routing, fallbacks, cost controls, and the right model for each task.
Capabilities
Integrate Claude, OpenAI, Gemini and open models into secure enterprise applications.
Evidence-based selection across frontier and open-source models, benchmarked on your tasks and your data.
Route by task complexity, cost and latency; fail over across providers without dropping requests.
Fine-tunes, adapters and distillation where they beat prompting — with evals proving the lift.
Caching, batching, prompt compression and right-sizing that cut spend without cutting quality.
How it works
Models change monthly. Your product shouldn't be rebuilt every time. We put a routing and evaluation layer between your application and the model market.
Smart routing
Simple queries go to fast, cheap models; complex reasoning goes to frontier models; sensitive data can stay on self-hosted open source. Routing rules are driven by evals, not vibes — and every route is measured.
Clean integration
One typed SDK for chat, tools, structured output and streaming — provider quirks handled underneath. Swapping a model becomes a config change with an eval run, not a rewrite.
// Route work to the right model const result = await ai.run({ task: "contract_review", context: retriever.fetch(doc), guardrails: ["pii", "grounding"], fallback: "gpt-4.1", });
Cost engineering
Prompt caching, semantic caching, request batching, context trimming and model right-sizing — applied systematically and verified by evals so quality never silently degrades.
Use cases
Products serving diverse tasks — chat, extraction, coding — each needing a different best model.
Failover and portability so one provider's outage or price change never becomes your incident.
Inference bills growing faster than revenue — audited, re-routed and re-engineered downward.
Routing sensitive workloads to self-hosted models while keeping frontier quality elsewhere.
Voice, autocomplete and interactive UX needing sub-second responses at acceptable cost.
Adopting each new model generation in days, with eval evidence before switching traffic.
Delivery
We start from the business outcome, then design agents, models, tools and guardrails that can survive production — not just a demo.
Map workflows, data, constraints and ROI.
Define models, tools, memory and trust boundaries.
Ship a production-ready system with evals and observability.
Optimize cost, quality and adoption across teams.
Our inference bill dropped 58% in the first quarter, and we shipped a new model into production in four days — something that used to take a two-month rewrite.
Works with your stack
Frontier APIs, cloud model platforms and self-hosted open source — benchmarked on your workload, routed through one layer.
FAQ
For your workload, nobody knows until it's measured. We benchmark candidate models on your actual tasks with your data, then let the evidence pick — and re-check as new models ship.
Usually not first. Better prompting, retrieval and routing capture most of the value. We fine-tune when evals show a persistent gap or when distilling volume onto a cheaper model pays for itself.
Every optimization — caching, routing, compression, right-sizing — runs behind an eval gate. If quality drops beyond threshold, the change doesn't ship. Typical results are 40–70% savings.
Yes — that's the point of the integration layer. Your application talks to one API; providers become swappable config underneath, with failover between them in production.
Yes. We typically harden what exists rather than rewrite: add routing, evals and observability around your current integration, then refactor only where it pays.
Next step
Get an integration layer that turns model churn into a config change.