LLMs and agent frameworks
Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models; LangGraph, Temporal and MCP for orchestration.
Try “KYC”, “Bedrock”, “Claude”, “insurance” or “ISO”.
Services
Best-in-class, model-agnostic stacks — chosen for reliability, security, and time-to-value in the enterprise.
Capabilities
The models, clouds, frameworks and tooling we use to build production AI systems.
Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models; LangGraph, Temporal and MCP for orchestration.
AWS, Azure and GCP with Terraform, ArgoCD and GPU-efficient serving.
Pinecone, pgvector, Elasticsearch, Snowflake and Databricks — fitted to workload.
Braintrust, LangSmith, OpenTelemetry and Datadog wired into delivery.
How we choose
Every technology choice we make is benchmarked on your workload, justified in writing and reversible by design. No badge-collecting, no resale margins.
Models
Frontier models where quality demands it, open models where volume or residency wins — behind a routing layer that keeps every choice swappable as the market moves monthly.
Infrastructure
Kubernetes, infrastructure-as-code and GitOps across all three majors — so your AI estate follows your cloud strategy instead of dictating it.
Quality tooling
Eval harnesses, tracing and cost observability aren't optional extras in our stack — they're how every other choice gets validated and every regression gets caught.
Use cases
Benchmarked on your tasks, not leaderboard vibes.
Fitted to scale, filters and ops reality.
LangGraph vs. Temporal vs. custom, argued honestly.
Workloads mapped to the right provider and region.
Platform components rented or owned deliberately.
Stack changes sequenced without breaking production.
Delivery
Flexible models — from strategy sprints to dedicated pods — with clear phases, quality gates, and ownership through production.
Goals, constraints, success metrics and stakeholders.
Architecture, delivery plan and risk controls.
Build, integrate, harden and launch.
Monitor, optimize cost and continuously improve.
FAQ
Because they've survived our production deployments — and the list changes when evidence does. Every recommendation comes with the reasoning and the benchmarks, so you can challenge it.
We hold cloud certifications but take no resale margins — our advice has no commission attached, which is rarer than it should be.
Yes — we extend what works and only propose replacement when the gap is material and measured. Migrations need better justification than novelty.
Continuous benchmarking on live projects, and a routing-layer architecture philosophy that makes new options adoptable in days — so churn becomes opportunity, not risk.
Next step
Bring your architecture questions — we'll answer with benchmarks and reasons, not partnerships.